|
|
|
An approach to understanding and minimising RISK. This article examines the logical process, the questions to ask, that one should go through in determining risk. This can be applied to almost any situation.....or the process shortened to get the best outcome. Martial arts is limited to contingencies where the stuff has already hit the rotating air circulation device (emergency responses) - however, a bit of thought will show us that there are reasons and processes that are clearly visible, thus allowing for recognition and avoidance. When looking at risk you should do the following: 1. State the risk - Recognition Why?
How?
What could go wrong in an underground parking lot at 6PM when I leave work late? How far away are the guards? Are there cameras on me? Can I be heard. Do walls obscure me from the sight of others? Ask: What is the ultimate effect that you are worried about? Are you concerned about whether or not your jump-spinning dragon kick will work if you are grabbed from behind, or are you getting to the crux of the matter - i.e: not getting into a high risk situation in the first place. Physical self-defence is not about fighting, it's about not being hurt by violence. 2. Planned Protection - reasonable precautions Why?
How?
See the problem from the perspective of youself, that of a potential perpetrator, as well as a third party onlooker who observes things you might miss. There ARE reasons why things happen. Find them and prevent or reduce their likelihood of precipitating a high risk situation. 2.2 Avoiding actions (how to avoid the problem) Why?
Is it more effective to go kicking and punching those three guys who are carrying hidden weapons (which requires the high risk scenario to actually happen, and then have you survive it), or would it be better to recognise and avoid the threat? Can I get a guard to walk me to my car instead of being far from help on my own in a dark parking area? Could I have moved my car to an area close to guards and exits during work hours while there was safety and activity? How
2.2.2
Evaluate viability of each suggested action and ask:
2.3 Contingent actions (after the problem has occurred) - repercussions Why?
Did your training teach you to run from danger, or did it teach you very explicitly to run towards safety? Do you run blindly into a dead end and become trapped while out of breath, or do you run towards lights and people where you can find safety? The closer you are to safety the more likely your pursuers are to abort. How:
2
Evaluate the viability of each suggested action and ask:
|
|
[ What we do ] [ Who we are ] [ Articles ] [ Media ] [ Contact Us ] [ Home ] ©
urban
shield 2002
|